Legal Opinion

Baum Et Ux v. Denn

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1949PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court perpetually enjoining the defendants from interfering with plaintiffs in using a roadway over and across the land of the defendants. The Federal Land Bank of Spokane, the holder of a mortgage on the land, was made a party defendant, but it made no appearance as its interests could in no way be affected by the suit for an injunction.

The road in controversy is on land owned by defendants Joseph A. Denn and Annabelle Denn Wiles, but defendants Henry Denn and his wife are in possession thereof under some interest not disclosed by the record.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Franzen v. ShenkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Koeber v. SomersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Minto v. Salem Water, Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. August v. BurnsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Heisley v. EastmanOregon Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Peters v. WallachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Buck Wilcoxon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  4. Moyer v. MoyerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  5. Coumas v. Transcontinental Garage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API