Franzen v. Shenk
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
This case came here on rehearing after decision by the district court of appeal, second district, first division, the opinion being written in the first instance by Mr. Presiding Justice Conrey. ■ After much consideration of the principal point presented in support of the appeal, we are constrained to hold that the reasoning and the conclusion of Mr. Presiding Justice Conrey clearly and correctly states the law of the case, and therefore we shall adopt his opinion as the opinion of this court. It is as follows:
“This is an action to recover damages for the malicious prosecution of a proceeding…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Eastin v. Bank of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Burke v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Dawson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Runo v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Downey Venture v. LMI Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Sosinsky v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.