Legal Opinion
Moyer v. Moyer
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided January 3, 1992PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIE, Chief Justice:
In this case the Court is called upon to decide under what circumstances an attorney, who negotiated a settlement agreement which failed in performance, may be called to testify as to communications the attorney had with a former client over the objection by the former client that such testimony would violate the attomey/client privilege.
Appellant/respondent below, Charles F. Moyer, has appealed from an order of the Family Court dated January 15,1991 which granted the motion of appellee/petitioner below, Donna L. Moyer, seeking the specific performance of an alleged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D. C. v. ZimmerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1976
- United States v. Richard William LandofCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- In re Ampicillin Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Baum Et Ux v. DennOregon Supreme Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Indiana Electrical Workers Pension Trust Fund IBEWSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Alaska Elec. Pension Fund v. BrownSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Secrest v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Glidden Co. v. JandernoaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
- Interfaith Housing Delaware, Inc. v. Town of GeorgetownDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1994
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.