Legal Opinion

Hoffer v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1989No. 53549-3PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Holders of bonds issued by the Washington Public Power Supply System (Supply System) sued the State of Washington and a handful of elected officials to recover damages suffered when the Supply System defaulted on its bond obligations. The trial court dismissed each of the claims set forth in the bondholders' complaint under CR 12(b)(6). On appeal, we reversed the dismissal as to eight of the nine claims before us. Hoffer v. State, 110 Wn.2d 415, 755 P.2d 781 (1988). We then granted reconsideration of two claims—one alleging negligent misrepresentation and the other alleging violations of The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hoffer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Weeks v. Chief of Washington State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Class v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Schaaf v. HighfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API