Weeks v. Chief of Washington State Patrol
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.
Plaintiffs, members of the Washington State Patrol, were required to work 9-hour duty days, 5 days a week (unless assigned to the graveyard shift where the duty day was 8 hours). The 9 hours included a 1-hour lunch break during which the plaintiffs were free to go anywhere within the area of their beat (including home) but were to remain on call. If actually called out during this time, departmental policy was to give time and a half off for the time spent on the call out.
In March 1979, the plaintiffs brought this class action suit contending that the 1-hour lunch period constituted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Triple "Aaa" Company, Inc., and D. G. Carpenter v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Biggs v. Joshua Hendy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.