Legal Opinion

Graff v. Geisel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1951No. 31642PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

Mr. and Mrs. Graff purchased the Utsalady Marina, a resort on Camano Island, Island county, Washington, on contract from Mr. and Mrs. Geisel. The Graffs brought this action in the superior court against the Geisels for rescission of the contract. Their basic contention in the trial court appears to have been that Mrs. Maxine Geisel induced them to purchase the Marina through false and fraudulent representations. They emphasized most strongly the following alleged representations by Mrs. Geisel: (1) That a franchise for the sale of Johnson outboard motors would be acquired by the Graffs with…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Oates v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Stewart v. LarkinWashington Supreme Court · 1913

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pope v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Boonstra v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Browning v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Harrington v. RichesonWashington Supreme Court · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API