Legal Opinion

Bowles Co. v. Clark

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1910No. 8588PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered September 22, 1909, in favor of the plaintiff upon an agreed statement of facts, in an action to foreclose a materialman’s lien.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellants Clark are the owners of certain real property in the city of Seattle on which they constructed a dwelling. At the time the house'was in the process of construction, defendant Fraser was the manager of the Enterprise Plumbing Company, and as such manager contracted with the Clarks to furnish the necessary materials and to do certain plumbing required by the plans of the house. After he had partially performed his contract he informed the appellants that the balance of the material to complete the *337work would cost between $65 and $70, and that he did not have such materials and…

2Cited by37 opinions

  1. Lamb v. General Associates, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Sturtevant Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Simpson v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Fowler v. COURTEMANCHEOregon Supreme Court · 1954

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API