Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Waldrop

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 1934No. 6 Div. 415PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

An amendment of a bill in equity was made at the hearing by striking 'out allegations in substance that complainant notified respondent of her rescission of the contract, and made a tender of the property purchased and demanded repayment of the money paid and return of the notes mentioned, all of which respondent failed and refused to do; and by adding to the bill a submission by complainant to the jurisdiction of the court, and an offer to do equity. This was done during the argument at the hearing. There was then a demurrer filed to the bill as thus amended, but no answer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Fogleman v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Davidson v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Hughes v. Albertville Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Tennessee Valley Bank v. CloptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atlas Auto Finance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. McAdory v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Lee v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Ex Parte LoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Ex Parte SharpeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API