Thomas v. Barnes
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
An executor of the deceased mortgagor may maintain a bill to enforce the equity of redemption of real estate when it would have been available to the mortgagor if alive. Griffith v. Rudisill, 141 Ala. 200, 37 So. 83, cited in Foster v. Foster (Ala. Sup.) 121 So. 80. In such proceeding the heirs with the legal title are not necessary parties, as it does not necessarily lead to a sale. But a bill for the foreclosure of such a mortgage must bring before the court the legal title, as it directly' leads to a sale of the land. Therefore, if the mortgagor is dead, his heirs or legatees must be…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Powe v. McLeod & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Langley v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- German-American National Bank v. LewisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
- Lawson v. Alabama Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Federal Automobile Ins. Ass'n v. MeyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- De Moville v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Cobbs v. NorvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Bromberg v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Dudley v. Colonial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Stansell v. TharpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.