Legal Opinion

Fogleman v. National Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 22, 1931No. 3 Div. 925PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

In our recent case of Ex parte Green, 221 Ala. 415, 129 So. 69, we had before us for review by mandamus the propriety of an order consolidating suits in equity. We there approved that method o'f review, and referred to the fact that no appeal is provided from such an order. The order of consolidation in this case is a part of a decree sustaining demurrers to the several bills of complaint, and it is to that extent assigned as error. This court has held that a decree from which no appeal may be taken because the time has expired may not be assigned as error on an appeal taken from another…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. McAllister v. C. H. ClementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Ex Parte GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. State ex rel. Matter v. John Ogden & American Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. BIRMINGHAM TRUST NATIONAL BANK, a National Banking Association, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John P. CASE, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Butler v. OlshanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Carter v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Chapman v. Rivers Construction CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  5. Ex Parte AshtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API