Legal Opinion

Lee v. Cunningham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 24, 1937No. 3 Div. 209PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The appellee, Cunningham, applied to the circuit court of Montgomery county, for the issuance of the writ of mandamus to the petitioner, Charles W. Lee, as state comptroller, commanding him to issue a warrant on the state treasurer for the payment of the sum of $585 alleged to have been exacted by the judge of probate of Mobile county, through error, as a license tax to the state for engaging in business by petitioner, as Van Heynigen Brokerage Company, in the city of Mobile, Ala., for the years 1919 to 1931 inclusive, under the provisions of Schedule 121 of section 361 of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Southern Natural Gas Corp. v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Ex Parte SchoelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Ex Parte AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Ex Parte AppersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. State v. Southern Natural Gas CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Alabama Dept. of Transp. v. Harbert Intern., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. ALABAMA AGR. AND MECHANICAL UNIV. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Vaughan v. SibleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. State Ex Rel. McQueen v. BrandonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API