Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Albertville Mercantile Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 7, 1911PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Marshall Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. A. H. Alston. Assumpsit by J. W. Hughes against Albertville Mercantile Company. From the judgment, Hughes appeals and submits a motion to establish a bill of exceptions. Subsequently to the handing down of this decision the case was transferred to the Court of Appeals, for a decision on its merits, and will be found reported in .3 Ala. App. 462; 57 South. 98.

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

The preponderance of evidence shows that a correct bill of exceptions was presented by the movant to the presiding judge, who was no doubt actuated by an honest impression and good intentions, made a material but improper change in same before signing. Section 3021 of the Code of 1907, provides for the establishment of a bill of exceptions when the judge fails or refuses to sign same.

We have heretofore held that in order to put the judge in default for a failure or refusal to sign, so as to enable the aggrieved party to establish one, it must appear that a correct bill was tendered. —…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turner v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Bradberry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Luther v. LutherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Mauney v. Electric Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Collins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. McRee v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API