Legal Opinion

KEIGHTLEY v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 2009No. SD 29405PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Chief Judge.

Appellant (“Movant”) was charged with statutory rape and two counts of statutory sodomy, found guilty on all counts, sentenced as a persistent offender, and lost his direct appeal. See State v. Keightley, 147 S.W.3d 179 (Mo.App.2004). His Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, was denied after an evidentiary hearing. Movant appeals, claiming that his trial counsel should have objected to an allegedly improper closing argument (Point I), and missed opportunities to show additional inconsistencies in the victim’s statements…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. KeightleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Bright v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Chaney v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Hughes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jennings v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API