Legal Opinion

Jennings v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 2013No. SD 31770PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, P.J.

Jurors found Bradley Jennings guilty of murdering his wife. His direct appeal failed. See State v. Jennings, 322 S.W.3d 598 (Mo.App.2010), which describes the offense, investigation, and criminal proceedings.

Jennings moved for post-conviction relief, ultimately raising 97 complaints about his lawyer and the trial. The judge who handled the murder trial held an evidentia-ry hearing and denied the motion.

Jennings now appeals that judgment, raising six points. By rule,1 we determine only whether the motion court’s findings and conclusions are clearly erroneous. “Those findings are presumptively…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Christeson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  4. State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Hughes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Otis Cornelious v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State ex rel. Hawley v. BegerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Jennings v. NashDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API