Legal Opinion

Chaney v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2002No. 24334PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Presiding Judge.

Timothy Chaney (“Movant”) appeals a judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief from his conviction for murder in the first degree. 1 We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury of killing M.W. (“Victim”), a girl who was three weeks away from her thirteenth birthday. The trial judge sentenced him to death in accordance with the jury’s recommendation. The conviction was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Missouri in State v. Chaney, 967 S.W.2d 47 (Mo.banc 1998). It set aside the death sentence, however, and ordered the trial court to resentence Mov-ant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. State v. ChaneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  4. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wagoner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Butler v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Goudeau v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Crooks v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. KEIGHTLEY v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API