Legal Opinion
Bright v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 12, 1999No. 22752PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.
This is a post-conviction case filed by Vincent Bright (Movant) pursuant to Rule 29.15. Movant seeks to have his conviction for second degree drug trafficking (class B felony, § 195.223 RSMo Cum.Supp.1993) set aside. In part, Movant alleges that his trial lawyers were ineffective for failing to “adequately advise [Movant] concerning the consequences of accepting or rejecting a plea offer from the State.” The motion *569court denied relief after an evidentiary hearing. This appeal followed. We affirm.
Appellate review of a denial of a Rule 29.15 motion is limited to a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Oscar Boria v. John Keane, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- State v. ColbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chaney v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. ReedMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- McDonald v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Joseph v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Bell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.