Legal Opinion

Hughes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 2007No. 28130PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder for fatally stabbing an unarmed man who was wrestling with one of Appellant’s friends. This court affirmed the conviction. State v. Hughes, 84 S.W.3d 176 (Mo.App.2002). Appellant thereafter sought Rule 29.15 1 relief, alleging that his trial and appellate counsel were ineffective for not challenging two jury instructions. The motion court denied relief after an evidentiary hearing, finding no Strickland 2 prejudice on the claims regarding trial counsel, and that appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise plain error.

Rule…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Holman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Hubbard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Sams v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  5. State v. HughesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Melillo v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Childress v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Joos v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Jennings v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Crowder v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API