Legal Opinion

Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Christensen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1995No. 18909, 18915PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

Appellants Russell Y. Christensen and Peter M. Christensen (Christensens) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Appellee Commercial Trust & Savings Bank (Bank), the award of costs for expenses incurred by a potential witness, and the denial of restitution for improvements made to leased property. By notice of review, Bank claims Christensens were not entitled to restitution for payments of real estate taxes and purchase installments made on an invalid lease and option agreement. We affirm all issues except we reverse and remand the award of witness costs.

F…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. City of Charlotte v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Nelson v. Nelson Cattle Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Anderson v. KammeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ziegler Furniture & Funeral Home, Inc. v. CicmanecSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Mattson v. RachettoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Pauley v. SimonsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Singpiel v. MorrisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API