Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 13, 1956No. 741PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendant assigns as errors the judge’s findings of fact numbered 3, 4, 5 and 7, his failure to find the facts as contended by the defendant, and the signing of the order.

This Court said in Bond v. Bond, 235 N.C. 754, 71 S.E. 2d 53: “The exception to the judgment entered presents for decision only two questions: (1) Do the facts found support the judgment, and (2) does any error of law appear upon the face of the record?”

At the time of their marriage on 15 November 1947, the plaintiff was a widow with five married children, and the defendant a widower with eight married children, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Ringgold v. RinggoldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Caddell v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Day v. DaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  5. Brooks v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Putnam v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Panhorst v. PanhorstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Harrell v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API