Legal Opinion

Cox v. Cox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 28, 1957No. 457PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

When a divorce action is instituted, jurisdiction over the custody of the children born of the marriage vests exclusively in the court before whom the divorce action is pending and becomes a concomitant part of the subject matter of the court’s jurisdiction in the divorce action. G.S. 50-13. Reece v. Reece, 231 N.C. 321, 56 S.E. 2d 641; Robbins v. Robbins, 229 N.C. 430, 50 S.E. 2d 183; Winfield v. Winfield, 228 N.C. 256, 45 S.E. 2d 259; Story v. Story, 221 N.C. 114, 19 S.E. 2d 136.

Therefore, when the plaintiff wife instituted the instant action for divorce, the court became vested in this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Bynum v. . PoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. Plemmons v. Southern Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Caldwell v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Story v. . StorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Sink v. EasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Bizzell v. BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Blackley v. BlackleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API