Teague v. Teague
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
The record is far from satisfactory. For example, Judge Gambill seems to have concluded that the exceptions and notice of appeal served on the plaintiff and her counsel on April 27 were sufficient to remove the case from the Superior Court to this Court. Actually, appeal notice was not given at the time the order was entered. G.S. 1-279 and 280, when construed together, required the defendant to serve notice of the appeal within 10 days. “The provisions are jurisdictional and unless complied with this Court acquires no jurisdiction of the appeal and must be dismissed.” Aycock v. Richardson,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- JIM WALTER CORPORATION v. GilliamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Joyner v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Aycock v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- O'Neill v. Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Peoples v. PeoplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Booth v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Brady v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Giannitrapani v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.