Legal Opinion
La Van v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 10, 2003No. 90-581 CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED OPINION1
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Defendant, United States (“government”), has moved for summary judgment with respect to all of the plaintiffs’ claims for monetary relief in this Winstar-related case, including all of plaintiffs’ remaining causes of action for restitution, rescission and a government taking under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839, 116 S.Ct. 2432, 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996). Plaintiffs have cross-moved for summary judgment in support of their claims for restitution, reliance and expectancy damages. Oral…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- La Van v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Southern California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Caroline Hunt Trust Estate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.