Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 22, 2003No. 92-540CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BLOCK, Judge.

This is a Winstar-related case. The issue addressed in this decision is that of standing to sue. Far more than a “mere technicality,” the doctrine of standing goes to the heart of the constitutional separation of powers because it defines the contours of the judicial power. It “serves to identify those disputes which are appropriately resolved through the judicial process.” Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 155, 110 S.Ct. 1717, 1722, 109 L.Ed.2d 135 (1990). It is through such mechanisms as standing that federal judicial power is limited, at times helping…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pueblo of Laguna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Kawa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Eagle Design & Management, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Dureiko v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API