Legal Opinion
La Van v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 3, 2004No. Nos. 03-5140, 03-5149PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
On summary judgment, the United States Court of Federal Claims held that the Government contracted with Richard C. LaVan, Carmen Lullo, and James Sko-zek during the conversion of Century Savings & Loan Association (CSLA) into a federally chartered stock thrift called Century Federal Savings Bank (Century), that the Government breached that contract, that the Government had to pay restitution but not expectancy or reliance damages, and that the Government was not liable under a takings theory. LaVan v. United States, 56 Fed. Cl. 580 (2003); LaVan v. United States, 53 Fed.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Erickson Air Crane Company of Washington, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Southern California Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Robert K. Oja v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- California Federal Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Citizens Federal Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Jumah v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.