Legal Opinion

Schultz v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1975No. S.F. 23293PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Edmund Broderick Schultz, in pro. per., for Petitioner.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of California that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law in this state for one year on conditions of probation, including actual suspension for the first month. Petitioner has practiced law in California since his admission to the State Bar in 1965 without record of previous discipline.

The disciplinary board’s recommendation is based on findings by a local administrative committee of the State Bar that, in two instances, petitioner unintentionally, through gross negligence,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. In Re KreamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Bernstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Giovanazzi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Guzzetta v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Finch v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Finch v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API