Schultz v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Edmund Broderick Schultz, in pro. per., for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of California that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law in this state for one year on conditions of probation, including actual suspension for the first month. Petitioner has practiced law in California since his admission to the State Bar in 1965 without record of previous discipline.
The disciplinary board’s recommendation is based on findings by a local administrative committee of the State Bar that, in two instances, petitioner unintentionally, through gross negligence,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re KreamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Bernstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Giovanazzi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Guzzetta v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Finch v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Finch v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.