Legal Opinion
Edward v. Kierulff
California Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 1917No. S. F. No. 7227PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
This action was brought against the exeeutors of the will of John Nightingale, deceased. The heirs of said Nightingale were also made parties defendant. The original complaint was filed March 12, 1913. In due course an amended complaint was filed. Defendants demurred to this pleading and their demurrer was sustained, and plaintiff refusing to amend within the time allowed by the court, judgment was accordingly entered in favor of defendants. The appeal is from this judgment.
By the amended complaint it is alleged that John Nightingale died about March 20, 1912, and the usual formal matters…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Bell v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Emerson v. Kennedy Mining & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Elliott v. BunceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Elliott v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garrity v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Goodfellow v. BarrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Talbot v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Rouse v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966