Elliott v. Bunce
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San. Francisco. Geo. A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The facts of the ease are stated by respondent substantially as follows: On December 21, 1853, Ada M. Hudson and George Hudson were married in the city and county of San Francisco and lived together as husband and wife until she died, May 17, 1897. He died March 12, 1898. On June 24, 1898, F. A. Elliott was appointed administrator of the estate of said Ada M. Hudson, deceased, and on June 16, 1898, Charlotte K. Clark was appointed special administratrix of the estate of said George Hudson, deceased. This action of Elliott v. Clark was begun on June 16, 1899, and on May 17, 1904, a judgment…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Garrity v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Elling v. FineMontana Supreme Court · 1917
- Edward v. KierulffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Malone v. CliseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936