Legal Opinion

United States v. Huffstatler

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 30, 2009No. 08-2622PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER

The following is before the court: MOTION TO AMEND OPINION, which the court construes as a petition for rehearing, filed on April 21, 2009, by counsel for the appellee.

IT IS ORDERED that this court’s opinion dated April 6, 2009 is VACATED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court’s mandate that issued on April 28, 2009 is VACATED and RECALLED.

2Per curiam

Mark Huffstatler pleaded guilty to producing child pornography, see 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), and the district judge imposed an above-guidelines sentence. Huffstatler seeks a remand for resentencing, contending that his sentence is unreasonable…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Donna Valentine v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, John Tominello, Mike Ditusa, and Joseph SeneseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Louis JamesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. PapeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. GroberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. HallidayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API