Legal Opinion

United States v. Roberson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2008No. 06-3458, 06-3663PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Robert Leon Roberson and Donald Leonard Sturgis appeal their sentences as unreasonable on the grounds that the district court failed to adequately consider the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) or to enunciate its reasons under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c). They also argue that the district court deprived them of their Sixth Amendment rights by basing their sentences on drug quantities not found by a jury and challenge the appellate presumption of reasonableness. Also at issue is the district court’s reliance on the 100:1 disparity between powder and crack cocaine quantities in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. United States v. Kevin P. DonnellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. United States v. SmartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. BetcherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API