Legal Opinion

Kimbrough v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 10, 2007No. 06-6330PublishedCited by 2,304 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg

This Court’s remedial opinion in United States v. Booker, 543 U. S. 220, 244 (2005), instructed district courts to read the United States Sentencing Guidelines as “effectively advisory,” id., at 245. In accord with 18 U. S. C. § 3553(a), the Guidelines, formerly mandatory, now serve as one factor among several courts must consider in determining an appropriate sentence. Booker further instructed that “reason*91ableness” is the standard controlling appellate review of the sentences district courts impose.

Under the statute criminalizing the manufacture and distribution of crack cocaine, 21 U. S.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Jama v. Immigration and Customs EnforcementSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,304 opinions

  1. United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. State of Tennessee v. Susan Renee BiseTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. United States v. FeemsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. CaveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

2,299 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API