Legal Opinion

United States v. Grober

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 26, 2010No. 09-1318, 09-2120PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BARRY, Circuit Judge.

It is an unassailable proposition that “[c]hild pornography harms and debases the most defenseless of our citizens.” United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285, 307, 128 S.Ct. 1830, 170 L.Ed.2d 650 (2008). We believe that, and the District Court believed that. Nonetheless, the Court was deeply concerned about the sentence the government said the Court should impose on defendant David Grober under the child pornography Guidelines. It recognized, on the one hand, the tension between a mechanical application of those Guidelines and the “outrageously high”…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. United States v. StabileCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. FumoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. HallidayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. ApodacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API