Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1903No. 13,175PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from Shawnee district court; Z. T. Hazen, judge. STATEMENT. This is a companion case to No. 12,988 (ante, p. 194). The defendant in error resided in Pittsburg, Pa., and as executor of the estate of James L: Reed placed in the hands of the plaintiff in error, an attorney living in Topeka, several claims for collection, out of which grew no little litigation. Harrison collected some $5400. He received also remittances of cash from Henderson.

Read the full summary

Error from Shawnee district court; Z. T. Hazen, judge. STATEMENT. This is a companion case to No. 12,988 (ante, p. 194). The defendant in error resided in Pittsburg, Pa., and as executor of the estate of James L: Reed placed in the hands of the plaintiff in error, an attorney living in Topeka, several claims for collection, out of which grew no little litigation. Harrison collected some $5400. He received also remittances of cash from Henderson. He paid out various amounts in costs and other disbursements and sent to Henderson on March 9, 1898, $1000. In April, 1898, Henderson came to Topeka…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J. :

The clainris made that the referee made no sufficient findings upon the issues between the parties. This objection was made to the referee without either specifically pointing out the deficiencies or requesting more specific or additional findings. The same objection was brought to the notice of the district court. It was overruled in both instances. We think there was no error in this.

The main and only meritorious question raised in the case is whether the rendering of the account of *205September 1, 1899, and its reception without…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Vaughan v. County of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. A. Krolik & Co. v. OssowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Chittenden & Eastman Co. v. Leader Furniture Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Hatten v. Interocean Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API