Legal Opinion

Curry v. MacKenzie

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1925PublishedCited by 204 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCardozo, J.

Civil Practice Rule 113 permits summary judgment at times in favor of a plaintiff though material averments of his complaint have been traversed by the answer. To that end there must be supporting affidavits proving the cause of action, and that clearly and completely, by affiants who speak with knowledge. There must be a failure on the part of the defendant to satisfy the court “ by affidavit or other proof ” that there is any basis for his denial or any truth in his defense. The case must take the usual course if less than this appears. To justify a departure from that course and the award…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Spellman v. . MuehlfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

3Cited by204 opinions

  1. Nassau Trust Co. v. Montrose Concrete Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Alvord & Swift v. Stewart M. Muller Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Glick & Dolleck, Inc. v. Tri-Pac Export Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1968

199 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API