Legal Opinion

Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Portener

California Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1903No. S.F. No. 2632PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Foreclosure of mortgage. Plaintiff had judgment, from which and from the order denying her motion for a new trial defendant appeals. The following are the facts in the case: Defendant executed and delivered to plaintiff her promissory note, dated December 9,1891, for ten thousand dollars, payable one year after date, and gave her mortgage to secure payment of same. On October 23, 1893, plaintiff filed its complaint asking foreclosure of said mortgage, and summons duly issued and was returned not served. Thereafter affidavit was made that defendant was concealing herself to avoid…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gray v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Merritt v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Westbay v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Crossman v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Heinlin v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lamb v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  3. Hubbard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Eulenberg v. Torley's Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Merino v. City of New York Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API