Legal Opinion

Eulenberg v. Torley's Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1943No. Civ. 2989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action for declaratory relief, for possession of certain premises and for damages. Torley’s Inc. operated a store, consisting of several departments, in Ontario. T. L. Eulenberg went to work in the drug department of this store with an agreement that if he were satisfied he should have the right to purchase the merchandise in that department, with a lease for the space occupied by it. Shortly thereafter, the parties entered into a memorandum of agreement which provided that these plaintiffs were to buy from Torley’s Inc. the stock of goods in this department not exceeding a value…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Westbay v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Robinson v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  3. See v. JoughinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Chase v. Van Camp Sea Food Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. PortenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tevis v. BeigelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Bartell v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Miller v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API