Legal Opinion · Dissent

Merino v. City of New York Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided May 7, 1926No. Nos. 3565, 3566, 3567 and 3568Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING 'OPINION

OP MB. JUSTICE WOLE.

As sufficiently appears from the majority opinion, the original judgment against the complainant in this case was rendered at his own solicitation and with his own consent; he was relieved from paying costs and the defendant paid its own costs. This constituted a retraxit and put an end to the litigation. Our Code of Civil Procedure has been taken from California and the principle of retraxit is recognized there under the code. Stoutenborough v. Bd. Education, 104 Cal. 664; Merritt v. Campbell, 47 Cal. 542; Crossman v. Davis, 79 Cal. 603; Hibernia…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merritt v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Crossman v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Stoutenborough v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. PortenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API