Legal Opinion

Westbay v. Gray

California Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1897No. Sac. No. 198PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County and from an order denying a new trial. Joseph H. Budd, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

Action to foreclose a mortgage executed by W. C. Turner, deceased, to secure his promissory note for $500 and interest, dated March 5, 1890.

W. W. Gray is the administrator of the estate of Turner, and the other defendants are his heirs, and no personal judgment was asked or had against them.

The note and mortgage were given to E. J. McKain, and by him indorsed and assigned to W. W. Westbay, the plaintiff herein. The cause was tried by the court, and a decree entered foreclosing the mortgage.

Defendant W. W. Gray, the administrator of the estate of W. C. Turner, deceased, appeals from…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Merritt v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Board of Commissioners (No. 2) v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Marsters v. LashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Doll v. GoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Crossman v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Lamb v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Rice v. CrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Carr v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. King v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Strupelle v. StrupelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API