Legal Opinion

Eliasen v. Hamilton

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 16, 1986No. 81 C 123PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GRADY, Chief Judge.

This securities case is before us on plaintiffs’ motion to review Magistrate Rosemond’s ruling permitting the deposition of plaintiff’s non-testifying expert. Memorandum Opinion and Order of Magistrate Rosemond (N.D.Ill. June 6, 1986) (“Order of Magistrate”). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). We affirm Magistrate Rosemond’s order permitting defendants to take the deposition, but we limit the scope of that deposition.

FACTS

During this litigation, plaintiffs retained two experts to assist them in preparing for trial. The first, H.J. Gruy & Associates (“Gruy”), is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Horace MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. Grinnell Corp. v. HackettDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1976
  4. Bailey v. Meister Brau, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  5. Marine Petroleum Company v. Champlin Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re Christus Spohn Hospital KlebergTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Intermedics, Inc. v. Ventritex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
  3. Adams v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1990
  4. Uncommon, LLC v. Spigen, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Pure Air on Lake Ltd., PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API