Legal Opinion

Uncommon, LLC v. Spigen, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided March 26, 2018No. Case No. 15–cv–10897PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Robert Blakey, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Uncommon, LLC sued Defendant Spigen, Inc. for using the trademarked term "Capsule" in the names of its cell phone cases, the same product that Plaintiff sells under the Capsule mark. Plaintiff brings claims for trademark infringement and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1125(a), and unfair competition under Illinois common law. [1]. Defendant asserts counterclaims seeking cancellation of Plaintiff's Capsule mark for genericness and descriptiveness. [47]. Before this Court are Plaintiff's motion to strike…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Velocity Patent LLC v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. 251 High Street Highwood LLC v. U.S. Bank National Association, individually, and as trustee for the Mastr Adjustable Rate Mortgages Trust 2007-3 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-3District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  3. Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company v. PACCARDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024
  4. B.H. v. KrauseDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
  5. Biggs v. Chicago Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API