Legal Opinion

Laurens L. Delano v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 19, 1968No. 35-63PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLLINS Judge *

Plaintiffs, 12 inspectors of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, seek by this action to recover overtime compensation under the Act of March 2, 1931,1 in addition to the overtime compensation which has been paid to them under that act for services performed as extra inspectors assisting in the examination of passengers on southbound trains entering the United States from Canada.

Pursuant to an agreement between the Delaware and Hudson Railroad and the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (hereinafter “Immigration Service”), passengers and crews of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Leonard J. Ganse v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Ahearn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  5. Margaret E. Schellfeffer v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, (3 Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. General Motors Corp. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Consumer Life Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  4. Acuna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  5. Louis Mossbauer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API