Acuna v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtSkelton, Judge
The 336 plaintiffs in these four cases are suing to recover compensation for work performed by them as immigration *209inspectors for the Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the Service), at several different ports in three of the Service’s four regions.1 Plaintiffs regularly work six days a week and receive the equivalent of seven days’ pay. They claim, however, that they are entitled by law to receive the equivalent of eight and one-half days’ pay. The case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment.
In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Laurens L. Delano v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Barrington Manor Apartments Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Delano v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Alabama v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Merck & Co. v. Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Bruce Sanford v. Caspar Weinberger, Dean K. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Yanko v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Gahagan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.