Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Clayton Const. Co., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 2003No. ED 81318PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., Presiding Judge

Plaintiffs, James Quinn and Diana Quinn, appeal from the trial court’s judgment dismissing their action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The trial court found that the workers’ compensation law constituted plaintiffs’ exclusive remedy. We affirm.

In January 1999, defendant, Clayco Construction Co., Inc. (Clayco), was the general contractor for a building project in O’Fallon Missouri. Defendants, Eric Hill and Richard Gregory, were employed by Clayco. 1 Plaintiff, James Quinn, was employed by C & R Mechanical, one of Clay-co’s subcontractors…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Badami v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. WallaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. James v. PoppaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. Felts v. Ford Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Howell v. Lone Star Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Groh v. KohlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Nowlin Ex Rel. Carter v. NicholsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State Ex Rel. Larkin v. OxenhandlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Graham v. GeiszMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Owner Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. New Prime, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API