Legal Opinion

Graham v. Geisz

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 2004No. ED 83925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his negligence claim against a co-employee for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because it was preempted by the Workers’ Compensation Law. We affirm.

Plaintiff, Henry Graham, filed a petition against defendant, Martha M. Geisz,' to recover damages for personal injuries. In his petition, plaintiff alleged that he and defendant were co-employees at Federal Express, who worked together loading and unloading cargo stored in large containers known as “cans” from airplanes. The cans were moved on rollers…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Badami v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Parmer v. BeanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Tauchert v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. WallaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  5. Kelley v. DeKalb Energy Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crissy Simpson v. Tim ThomureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. Arbogast v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Crissy Simpson v. Tim ThomureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. Steve Shiffman v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Club, LLC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API