Legal Opinion

James v. Poppa

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 24, 2002No. SC 84485PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. 1

Rhonda James sued Michael Poppa for medical malpractice alleging that his negligent diagnosis and treatment of injuries she suffered in the course and scope of her employment for Heartland Hospital caused her additional injury. The sole question on appeal is whether the trial court correctly ruled that it had no jurisdiction over James’ malpractice claim against Dr. Poppa because her claim is governed exclusively by the workers’ compensation laws, set out in chapter 287, RSMo 2000.

The trial court’s ruling was erroneous. Chapter 287 is inapplicable where, as here, the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Parmer v. BeanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. RyanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. Burns v. Employer Health Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Missouri Soybean Ass'n v. Missouri Clean Water CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Hertz Corp. v. Raks Hospitality, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Crow v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State Ex Rel. MW Builders, Inc. v. MidkiffSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  5. Quinn v. Clayton Const. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API