Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Badami v. Gaertner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1982No. 42415PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

Relators sought our writ of prohibition to prevent respondent from proceeding further in the underlying lawsuit, Lott v. Ba-dami and Lang. In division, we issued our preliminary writ and, subsequently, made that writ permanent. Respondent’s motion for rehearing was granted and, after briefing and oral argument, we again make the writ absolute. In so doing, we adopt, without quotation marks, those portions of the divisional opinion which reflect our present consensus.

In the Lott case, plaintiff seeks to recover against defendants for severe injuries sustained during his employment…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. McGinnis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Orcutt v. Century Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Harriman v. StoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Rivera Santana v. Superior Packaging Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
  2. Curt Peters and Cheri Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., and Patrick TerrioSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  3. Iddings v. Mee-LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. WallaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  5. Robinson v. HookerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API