Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 27, 1997No. 893, September Term 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIEME, Judge.

At issue in this appeal is the interface of Prince George’s County’s Differentiated Case Management Plan with Md.Ann. Code art. 27, § 591 (1957, 1996 Repl.Vol.) and Maryland Rule 4-271. 1

Appellant Harold Melvin Franklin appeals from an order of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County denying his Motion to Dismiss all charges. Franklin’s motion maintained that the State failed to comply with Maryland statutes that require a defendant to be tried within 180 days of arraignment or appearance of defense counsel. We shall reverse the circuit court’s denial of Franklin’s motion,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Goins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. Calhoun v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Rosenbach v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. GOLDRING & LYLES v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. GOLDRING & LYLES v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Timberlake v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API