GOLDRING & LYLES v. State

*492BELL, Chief Judge.

This is yet another case in which this Court is required to consider the proper sanction for violation of Maryland Code (1957, 1999 Repl.Vol.) Article 27, § 5911 and Maryland Rule 4-271.2 In this case, it is contended by Wilmer Anthony Goldring and Clarence Lyles, the petitioners, that the continuance that resulted in a trial date beyond the 180 day period prescribed by the statute and the rule, was not properly granted because the trial judge who granted it had been improperly designated by the county administrative judge, and thus was not authorized to do so. Judge…