Rosenbach v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Judge.
In State v. Hicks, 285 Md. 310, 403 A.2d 356, on motion for reconsideration, 285 Md. 334, 403 A.2d 368 (1979), we considered Maryland Code (1957, 1976 Repl.Vol.) Article 27, § 591 and former Maryland Rule 746 (now, with some changes, Rule 4-271(a)). We held that their provisions for bringing a criminal case to trial within a specified period were mandatory and that violation of those provisions would result in the dismissal of the case with prejudice. 285 Md. at 318, 403 A.2d at 360. We further held that to avoid that sanction any postponement beyond the specified period had to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Goins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Farinholt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Pennington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Tapscott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- State v. ToneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.