King v. Unger
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.
This is an appeal by defendants from an order by the trial court granting plaintiff a new trial after ‘ the jury, at the instruction of the trial judge, returned a verdict in favor of the defendants in an action to recover damages for personal injuries.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff, as we must do in reviewing a judgment based upon a directed verdict (Estate of Lances, 216 Cal. 397, 400 [14 Pac. (2d) 768]), the facts are these: About 10 A. M. on February 27, 1937, plaintiff arrived at the northwest corner of Broadway and Ninth Streets, where they intersect in the city of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Moss v. H. R. Boynton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Rabe v. Western Union Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Salomon v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Mayer v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Mixon v. Riverview HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Young v. TassopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Young v. Berry Equipment Rentals, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Goodwin v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.