Legal Opinion

King v. Unger

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1938No. Civ. 11686PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendants from an order by the trial court granting plaintiff a new trial after ‘ the jury, at the instruction of the trial judge, returned a verdict in favor of the defendants in an action to recover damages for personal injuries.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff, as we must do in reviewing a judgment based upon a directed verdict (Estate of Lances, 216 Cal. 397, 400 [14 Pac. (2d) 768]), the facts are these: About 10 A. M. on February 27, 1937, plaintiff arrived at the northwest corner of Broadway and Ninth Streets, where they intersect in the city of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Moss v. H. R. Boynton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Rabe v. Western Union Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Salomon v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Mayer v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Mixon v. Riverview HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Young v. TassopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Young v. Berry Equipment Rentals, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Goodwin v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API