Legal Opinion

Rast v. Fischer

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1951No. Civ. 18433PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action brought by plaintiffs wherein they sought declaratory relief, damages, a decree establishing a certain line as the true boundary between the property of plaintiffs and the property of defendants, quieting plaintiffs’ title by adverse possession to a triangular strip of land constituting the property in dispute, and enjoining defendants from building so as to encroach upon the asserted true boundary.

Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that a common boundary line was established in 1924 and was accepted as the true boundary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clapp v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Janke v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Pedersen v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Huddart v. McGirkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Garrett v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Van Buskirk v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Meacci v. KochergenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Zachery v. McWilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Fallert v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Janes v. LeDeitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API